Upload the package
Add your screenplay, topsheet and current financing assumptions.
Independent film financial intelligence
Know what your film’s numbers say.
Turn your screenplay, budget and financing plan into a rigorous financial analysis investors can understand.
Transparent assumptionsScenario modellingInvestor-ready reports
FINANCIAL SNAPSHOTModelled
The Midnight Run
Crime Thriller · Independent Feature
78/100
FinanceabilityStrong potential
At the proposed budget
Production budget$2.2M
Breakeven receipts$3.1M
Base-case ROI46%
Probability of recoupment63%
Illustrative model. Results are estimates, not guarantees.
BUILT FOR THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE TO MAKE THE NUMBERS WORK
WRITERSPRODUCERSFINANCIERSSALES TEAMS
One project. One clear financial story.
From package to investor report.
Model the outcomes
Compare revenue ranges, distribution deductions, timing and recoupment.
Present with confidence
Download a polished report with every material assumption disclosed.
Industry feedback
What filmmakers are saying.
Feedback from working film professionals who have used SlateGauge on real projects.
Simple, project-based pricing
Choose the depth your project needs.
Financial Snapshot
Free
Test the financial shape and commercial positioning of your idea.
- Budget-position check
- Preliminary breakeven
- Three revenue scenarios
- One-page story and market overview
Finance Essentials
$99
Core analysis for projects moving through active development.
- 6–8 named U.S. comparable films
- Budget and market positioning
- Downside, base and upside
- Concise screenplay coverage
MOST POPULAR
Investor Ready
$229
A complete financial and creative narrative for an active capital raise.
- 6–8 named U.S. comparable films
- ROI, IRR and waterfall
- Sensitivity and risk analysis
- Full studio-style screenplay coverage
Studio Package
$349
The complete decision package for serious producer and investor conversations.
- Everything in Investor Ready
- SlateGauge greenlight scorecard
- Investor executive memo
- Priority delivery and one revised analysis
Methodology
Every conclusion traces back to an assumption.
SlateGauge evaluates the relationship between budget, market positioning, comparable performance, financing structure and distribution economics. It does not promise a film’s outcome.
Project profile
Genre, format, budget, audience, cast status, production location and distribution plan.
Comparable set
6–8 named U.S.-market comparisons based on genre, tone, audience, scale, release path and package relevance.
Revenue ranges
Multiple scenarios with confidence ranges instead of a single unsupported prediction.
Investor economics
Fees, expenses, soft money, timing, waterfall, breakeven, ROI and IRR.
Important
SlateGauge reports are decision-support tools, not investment advice, appraisals, guarantees or offers to sell securities.
Account active
Your SlateGauge account
Secure account recovery
Choose a new password
Protected connectionPrivate documentsVerified payments
Client workspace
Your projects
Create an analysis, upload materials and track each report from one private workspace.
Owner access
SlateGauge administrationAll customer submissions are visible here. Administrator access bypasses checkout.
AdministratorIndustry access
Complimentary Studio Coverage
Grant one use of Studio Coverage to a specific email address. The recipient can claim it after signing in with that same email.
Recent complimentary coverage
Available, reserved, redeemed or revokedNo grants loaded yet.
Your projects
Private to your accountLoading your projects…
Your first analysis starts here.
Add your project details and upload the screenplay or budget when you are ready.
We could not load the workspace.
Please refresh and try again.
Private submission
Project intake
Create a new analysis
Save the project first, then SlateGauge securely uploads its supporting files. You can return and revise a draft at any time.
SlateGauge
CONFIDENTIAL · INVESTOR READY ANALYSISCRIME THRILLER · FEATURE FILM
The Informant
Independent film financial analysis and scenario model
SLATEGAUGE FINANCEABILITY SCORE78/100
Strong potential at the proposed production budget.
The model indicates a viable path to recoupment, subject to execution, market access and final package strength.
01 · DECISION OVERVIEW
Executive summary
The project’s proposed capital structure is evaluated against three revenue outcomes. Values below are modelled estimates—not promises of performance.
Production budget$2.20M
Equity sought$1.70M
Base gross receipts$3.74M
Base investor ROI36%
Key strengths
- Soft-money contribution reduces equity exposure.
- Scenario assumptions are explicit and independently adjustable.
- A defined recoupment waterfall clarifies investor participation.
Priority diligence
- Verify all incentives, estimates and financing commitments.
- Validate distributor deductions and release assumptions.
- Re-run the model when cast, sales or budget inputs change.
Reading the model
Gross receipts represent worldwide receipts before the modelled distribution fee. Investor returns are calculated after this deduction using the illustrative waterfall shown later in this report.
02 · PACKAGE & POSITIONING
Project profile
A financeability score is a structured indicator of the relationship among budget, financing leverage, genre positioning and projected recovery—not a credit rating.
FORMATFeature Film
GENRECrime Thriller
PRODUCTION TERRITORYCanada
REPORT STAGEPre-financing model
78/100
Financeability assessment
The project demonstrates strong potential at the proposed budget. Closing risk remains dependent on package quality, verified incentives and a credible distribution strategy.
High riskBalancedStrong
Score components
Capital efficiency74
Financing leverage68
Scenario resilience71
Market positioning72
03 · CREATIVE ASSESSMENT
Story overview
This preview shows the SlateGauge coverage format. In production, the synopsis and analysis will be generated from the securely uploaded screenplay.
OVERALL COVERAGECONSIDERPromising commercial foundation
74/100
Logline assessment
Preview placeholder: The central premise, protagonist, objective, opposition and stakes will be distilled into a concise market-facing logline, followed by an assessment of clarity, originality and commercial hook.
Synopsis
The production analysis will provide a spoiler-inclusive synopsis covering the inciting incident, major turning points, midpoint, climax and resolution. It will be written for producers and decision-makers rather than as promotional copy.
Preview limitation
No screenplay text has been analyzed in this static demonstration. Creative findings shown here describe the final report structure only.
04 · STORY & STRUCTURE
Dramatic execution
Each category receives a written assessment, evidence from the screenplay and a transparent score.
What the analysis identifies
- Act turns and narrative momentum
- Cause-and-effect progression
- Escalation of obstacles and stakes
- Setups, payoffs and unresolved threads
Revision priorities
- The highest-impact structural change
- Sequences that may be compressed
- Moments requiring clearer motivation
- Opportunities for a stronger climax
Evidence-based notes
The final system will attach scene or page references to significant observations so filmmakers can act on the coverage.
05 · CHARACTER & DIALOGUE
Character engine
The coverage tests whether the protagonist’s choices drive the story and whether supporting roles create meaningful pressure, contrast and change.
PROTAGONIST
Goal, flaw and agency
Assesses clarity of desire, internal need, active decision-making and earned transformation.
76ANTAGONISTIC FORCE
Pressure and credibility
Assesses opposition, escalating consequences and connection to the central theme.
73SUPPORTING CAST
Function and distinction
Assesses individual purpose, relationships, voice and opportunities for consolidation.
70DIALOGUE
Voice and subtext
Assesses character differentiation, exposition, rhythm, subtext and performability.
72Production-facing character insight
The completed report will also flag demanding roles, cast-dependent material, ensemble balance and character elements that materially affect package value or production cost.
06 · CREATIVE–COMMERCIAL FIT
SlateGauge scorecard
The scorecard separates screenplay craft from commercial and production considerations so one strong dimension does not hide another weak one.
WRITING74Consider
CONCEPT82Strong
CHARACTERS73Consider
MARKET FIT72Consider
PRODUCTION FIT76Consider
OVERALL74CONSIDER
PASSCONSIDERRECOMMEND
Why it could move forward
- Clear audience-facing premise
- Financeable concept-to-budget relationship
- Identifiable package and marketing hooks
What must improve first
- Highest-impact screenplay revision
- Unverified market and sales assumptions
- Attachments required to strengthen execution
Not a purchasing decision
Pass, Consider and Recommend are coverage opinions—not guarantees of financing, sale, production or commercial performance.
07 · SOURCES & USES
Capital structure
This view tests whether identified financing sources cover the proposed production budget and highlights any remaining financing gap.
Soft moneyEquityFinancing gap
Sources of capitalUSD
Soft money / incentives$500K
Private equity sought$1.70M
Unidentified financing gap$0
Total sources$2.20M
SOFT-MONEY COVERAGE23%
Share of production budget funded by non-equity sources.
EQUITY EXPOSURE77%
Share of budget expected from investor capital.
Capital check
The entered sources fully cover the proposed production budget.
08 · REVENUE RANGE
Downside, base and upside
The three cases are deliberately separated to prevent a single-point forecast from being mistaken for certainty.
DOWNSIDE
0.75× budgetPartial investor recoveryBASE CASE
1.70× budgetCapital recouped + profitUPSIDE
3.40× budgetMeaningful profit participationScenario comparisonInvestor economics
Downside investor distribution$1.24M
Base investor distribution$2.35M
Upside investor distribution$3.85M
Model boundary
These scenarios do not predict audience demand. They show the financial consequences if the stated revenue levels occur.
09 · RECEIPTS TO PRODUCER
Distribution deductions
The model applies the entered distribution fee to each gross-receipts case. Other expenses must be added when known.
BASE GROSS RECEIPTS$3.74M
−DISTRIBUTION FEE$748K
=NET MODEL RECEIPTS$2.99M
Modelled distribution fee20%
Base net margin80%
Gross break-even$2.13M
Deductions not yet included
Recoupable distribution expenses
Sales-agent commissions
Guild residuals and participations
Collection-account fees
Taxes, withholding and currency
Delivery and legal costs
Conservative diligence
A production report should be re-run when a distributor, sales agent or collection-account agreement provides actual fees and expense caps.
10 · INVESTOR DISTRIBUTIONS
Illustrative waterfall
The report assumes investors receive 100% of available model receipts until contributed equity is returned, followed by 50% of remaining profits.
1FIRST POSITION
Distribution deductions
The modelled distribution fee is deducted from gross receipts.
2SECOND POSITION
Return of capital
Available net receipts flow to investors until the equity contribution is recouped.
3THIRD POSITION
Profit participation
Remaining net profits are divided 50% to investors and 50% to the producer side.
Base-case waterfallIllustrative
Net model receipts$2.99M
Return of investor capital$1.70M
Remaining profit pool$1.29M
Investor share of profit$645K
Total investor distribution$2.35M
11 · ROI & TIMING
Investor return profile
Returns are shown before investor-specific taxes. Annualized return uses an illustrative three-year realization period.
BASE-CASE INVESTOR ROI38%
$645K modelled profit above returned capital
Capital invested$1.70M
Total distribution$2.35M
Illustrative annualized return11.4%
Illustrative receipt timing
0Investment−$1.70M
24Months35%
36Months35%
48Months30%
Timing sensitivity
Later receipts reduce annualized returns even when the same total dollars are ultimately distributed. The production model should be updated as contractual payment schedules become known.
12 · WHAT CHANGES THE OUTCOME
ROI sensitivity
Base-case investor ROI is recalculated across changes in receipts and distribution fees. The highlighted cell reflects the current model.
GROSS RECEIPTS VS. BASE
| 15% fee | 20% fee | 30% fee | |
|---|---|---|---|
| −25% | — | — | — |
| Base | — | — | — |
| +25% | — | — | — |
DISTRIBUTION FEE
Most sensitive to
- Worldwide receipts realized
- Distribution fee and recoupable expenses
- Final equity requirement
Potential protections
- Confirm incentive eligibility before closing
- Negotiate expense caps and reporting rights
- Use an independent collection account
13 · MARKET CONTEXT
U.S. comparable-film set
Production reports include 6–8 named U.S.-market comparable films selected for relevance. Comparable titles are qualitative positioning references; SlateGauge does not claim unverified commercial performance data.
ComparableWhy it belongsWeight
Genre / tone matchSimilar audience promise and commercial positioningHigh
Budget-band matchComparable production scale and capital exposureHigh
Release-path matchSimilar theatrical, streaming or hybrid strategyMedium
Package-strength matchComparable cast, director and sales attachmentsMedium
Territory matchSimilar production and target-market profileSupporting
Comparable selection standard
01Verify budget and revenue source
02Record release date and path
03Adjust for scale and timing
04Document relevance weighting
Data integrity
Comparable titles are positioning references. Financial performance should not be presented as authoritative without a documented external source, date accessed and explanation of relevance.
14 · DILIGENCE PRIORITIES
Principal risks and mitigations
Risk ratings identify areas requiring verification or contractual protection before capital is committed.
RiskRatingSuggested mitigation
Revenue realizationHIGH
Use multiple scenarios; avoid relying on a single sale or territory.
Distribution expensesMEDIUM
Negotiate caps, approval rights and regular statements.
Production overageMEDIUM
Maintain contingency and evaluate completion protection.
Incentive eligibilityMEDIUM
Obtain professional estimates and confirm qualifying spend.
Timing and liquidityHIGH
Disclose the long and uncertain realization period.
Package executionMEDIUM
Reassess after binding cast, director and sales commitments.
15 · MODEL GOVERNANCE
Assumptions and limitations
Every decision-support model is only as reliable as its inputs. Material assumptions should be validated independently before use.
Revenue cases
Downside, base and upside cases are scenario inputs derived from the proposed production budget. They are not forecasts or guarantees.
Distribution
The entered fee is applied to gross receipts. Unspecified expenses, commissions, residuals, taxes and participations are excluded.
Investor waterfall
The preview assumes return of equity followed by a 50/50 investor–producer split. Governing legal documents control actual distributions.
Timing
Annualized returns use an illustrative three-year realization period. Actual timing can materially alter IRR.
Comparable data
Production reports provide 6–8 named U.S.-market comparable titles. Any budgets, grosses, sales or other performance figures require a verified external data source and are not inferred by SlateGauge.
Important disclosure
SlateGauge provides informational financial modelling for filmmakers. It does not provide legal, tax, accounting, valuation or investment advice; verify securities-law requirements with qualified counsel. This report is not an appraisal, fairness opinion, offer to sell securities or solicitation to invest. Film investment is speculative and investors may lose their entire investment.
MODEL GENERATEDSeptember 11, 2026
REPORT IDSG-DEMO-2026
STATUSPreview · Unreviewed